I don’t
think I’ve seen a film with as many painful blows to the head as those given
out in Costa Gavras’s Z. Gavras, aside from being one of the best political
filmmakers of all time, also tells a great story. You feel the intimidation applied to the opposition
party as they attempt to bring in a speaker on nuclear disarmament only to be
met with stonewalling in the form of potential venues canceling under government
pressure and the creation of new laws hindering the right to assemble.
You
share the sense of helplessness as the military government using secret societies,
paramilitary groups bring big gangs of armed thugs to disrupt the talk and
eventually kill the speaker by hitting him on the head.
You
share the rage at the cover-up that follows – the intimidation of witnesses,
the ridiculous story of their version of what happened.
You
feel the sense of jubilation at the end when a dogged prosecutor finally runs
down those who are guilty indicting the whole junta in the process.
Gavras
is also not afraid of indicting America for its Cold War coddling of right-wing
dictatorships. Here the reference point
is Gavras’s native Greece and the military dictatorship that ran at America’s
behest under the fig leaf of fighting communists.
Gavras
tells his story like a documentary filmmaker showing different versions of what
happened during a particular event but also making it clear which one is the
truth.
STATE
OF SEIGE is even more direct in its tale, based on the true story of Dan
Mitrione, of a CIA torture specialist in Uruguay (whose cover story is head of
a US Aid organization) kidnapped and interrogated by
local guerillas. The scenes of torture
taught to Uruguay’s military dictatorship complete with scenes of electric shocks
applied to people’s genitals are powerful because they are not presented dramatically
but rather as if this was something real captured on film perhaps by hidden
camera.
SIEGE
works because it shows us all the angles as the charming but evil CIA man (well
played by Yves Montand who also plays the murdered political leader in Z)
gradually breaks down under the probing of his questioner never actually
completely confessing but finally stopping the denial of the horrible things he has
done.
It is
hard to make a good political film with preachiness and ideology getting in the
way of a good story. Gavras filters his
narrative through a form of cinema verite that is very story based and very
active. The end result is two great
passionate films that also serve to remind us of America’s negative anti- human
rights policies during that time.